Archive | May 2013

Muslim acts of beheading in the West – by Daniel Pipes

Written by Daniel Pipes on May 23rd

The gruesome murder yesterday of a soldier outside London by a Muslim convert, Michael Adebolajo, brings to mind that throat slitting and beheading are Islamically sanctioned forms of execution. Although these occur particularly often in the course of family-related crimes – think, for example, of the case of Aasiya Hassan in suburban Buffalo, N.Y., killed by her husband in 2009, stabbed with two hunting knives more than forty times in the face, back and chest, then beheaded – this monstrous form of violence is also used in non-family instances. Some of those that took place over the past decade in the West in chronological order include:


In addition, Ibragim Todashev, who was shot and killed yesterday while being interviewed about the Waltham murders, reportedly grabbed a knife and stabbed an officer several times, including in the head, possibly an attempt on his neck. In any case, it was so threatening that the officers used deadly force and on the spot killed Todashev.

This list (to be updated as needed) is only part of the story: other characteristically Muslim crimes taking place in Western countries include honor killings, female genital mutilation, and slave holding. These, sadly, are among Islam’s contributions to the lands of immigration.

Postscript: What this analysis does not cover: (1) Daniel Pearl, Nick Berg, and other Westerners murdered in Pakistan, Iraq, and other non-Western places. (2) Meir Kahane, Hitoshi Igarashi, and other prominent individuals assassinated in the West but not beheaded; Theo van Gogh is the only person listed both here and at “Islamist Assassinations in the West.” (May 23, 2013)

Related Topics:  Muslims in the West, Radical Islam

Text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.

Lawrence Auster’s “First Law of Majority-Minority Relations”

The late Lawrence Auster, writing in 2002, about the Islamic threat. This article is so pertinent and up-to-date, that he might have penned it this past week.

The First Law of Majority-Minority Relations

Having read Ann Coulter’s column on the media’s amazing attempts to downplay the fact that John Muhammad is … um, a Muhammedan, I think it may be time to re-state Auster’s First Law of Majority-Minority Relations in Liberal Society:

The worse any designated minority or alien group behaves in a liberal society, the bigger become the lies of Political Correctess in covering up for that group.  Thus, instead of the revelation over the last 14 months of Islam’s dangerous and savage character leading (as would happen in a rational world) to a major discrediting of Muslims, or at least to a more sceptical attitude toward them, it has led to their being more favored, more coddled and more protected from criticism than ever before.  They now get a whole new level of solicitous, sycophantic treatment, ranging from PBS “histories” of Islam that are more full of uncritical celebration of their subject than a tourist travelogue, to the media’s constant attacks on the rest of us for indulging in an anti-Muslim backlash which has somehow never occurred.

That last point leads us to the first corrolary of Auster’s First Law of Majority/Minority Relations in Liberal Society:  The more egregiously any non-Western or non-white group behaves, the more evil whites are made to appear for noticing and drawing rational conclusions about that group’s bad behavior.

The First Law and its corrolary are intrinsic to liberalism.  Once the equality of all human groups is accepted as a given, any facts that make a minority or foreign group seem worse than the majority native group must be either covered up or blamed on the majority.

The uniform of feminism as worn by Coleen Rooney

Coleen Rooney is the wife of footballer Wayne Rooney, a man who has found it difficult to keep the vows he made to Coleen on their wedding day. They are an extremely wealthy couple, and, a fawning media and a decadent society see this couple as “role models.”

Mrs.Rooney is seen as a fashion trendsetter, but we have to ask, what is she “modelling,” when it comes to clothing? She wears the uniform of feminism, because the sisterhood has a uniform. How shall we describe it? Plunging necklines, short skirts/dresses, tight clothing, and, a complete abandonment of decency and propriety.This is an accurate description of the plague of public immodesty unleashed on society by Feminism.

The feminist uniform is required dress for the modern mother-to-be and the message such clothes must communicate is, liberation i.e pregnancy must not get in the way of feminist self expression and it must not be allowed to restrict women from doing whatever they desire to do and from dressing in any way they choose. Click on the following link to see a heavily pregnant Coleen Rooney in her feminist uniform and ask the question, “Is that outfit ladylike and decent?”

Of course, you will only ponder that question if you care about the feminist assault on public morals and propriety.

We do!

This entry was posted on May 24, 2013. 5 Comments

There was a soldier, a British soldier …

To see pictures of the young soldier brutally slain yesterday, click on the following link,

I was deeply moved to see these pictures of the gallant young man, on his wedding day, and on duty. He was 25 years old and his terrible death has sentenced his family to a lifetime of sorrow.

His killers are deserving of the death penalty, but the sentence of death cannot be pronounced on them as it was abolished. That being the situation, in their case, life in prison had better mean just that, i.e they must never be released.

This entry was posted on May 23, 2013. 4 Comments