Male Feminists – The Monstrous Regiment’s “useful idiots!”

As Soviet Marxism had its “useful idiots”, so Marxism applied to gender (that is FEMINISM), has those it makes use of to further its goals, whilst finding such people contemptible. The male feminist is the modern-day version of those people who were made use of and then discarded (or worse) by the old-style Reds.

It is almost a contradiction in terms, the “male feminist”, because such individuals are helping a monstrous regiment (of feminists  i.e  the female variety), to emasculate them and enslave them.

Here are some quotes from feminists which clearly show the hatred many of them have for men.

“I feel that ” man-hating” is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.”       Robin Morgan,   “Ms”  Magazine editor

“I want to see a man beaten to a ……..  pulp with a high – heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.”      Andrea Dworkin

“The more famous and powerful I get, the more power I have to hurt men.”  Sharon Stone,  Actress

Feminism, Socialism and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist Government is the goal of Feminism.  Catharine  A. Mackinnon

“The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist.”  National Organisation of Women Times    Jan 1988


I find these quotes chilling and I’m a woman. Men should be likewise disturbed  and even fearful, because, make no mistake, if a male feminist deviates from the  feminist script and the role the feminists permit such to play in the twisted, insular world that the feminists inhabit, he/they will be shown no mercy.

Then will the ugly face of man-hating feminism be exposed and its male victims will vainly look for help and understanding from their “comrades” in the struggle for “equality.” Too late will some discover that “equality” for men was never in view!


4 thoughts on “Male Feminists – The Monstrous Regiment’s “useful idiots!”

  1. I find very little to disagree with in any of those quotes, except for “The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian in order to be fully feminist”. It should be “…every woman must be willing to be identified as asexual in order to be fully feminist”. And I’m a lesbian. And men have oppressed women for almost all of history. It’s about time the tables are turned. Let’s see how THEY like it.

  2. Hermoine,
    SOME men have oppressed women throughout history, and SOME women have oppressed men. Ever hear of the logic fallacy of over-generalization?

    A woman needs to be fully heterosexual to be a real woman. Otherwise she is just playing at being a man.

    • The inability or refusal of feminists to distinguish between “some” and “all” reflects poorly on their ability to comprehend set theory, particularly Venn diagrams. This intellectual black hole appears whenever the topic turns to spousal/partner abuse statistics; the myth about men earning 23% more than women (or whatever trumped-up figure is being tortured these days); and anything portraying women as anything other than victims.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s