Archive | June 2012

The Monstrous Regiment of Women (Title Credit to the Reformer John Knox)

One of the most successful “isms” of Marxism has undoubtedly been the Feminist movement. How does feminist ideology affect a country? Think of Sweden and Iceland, two countries slowly descending into madness because of their acceptance and aggressive promotion of Feminism. 

Last year, Sweden proudly announced the opening of a new “gender-free” pre-school ! Iceland has an openly gay woman Prime Minister, and has been titled “the most gender equal country in the world”. In the present election campaign in that country, one of the candidates is an unmarried mother of three children, one a newborn. She has a boyfriend (we do not use the word “partner”), and they intend to marry this summer. It’s about time!! He will be a “stay-at-home” Dad. What an example of “turning things upside down” and “back to front” and “inside out”.

Feminism does not liberate, it enslaves, and it has a coarsening effect on manners and behaviour. Chivalry has all but disappeared as men run for cover from the venomous insults of this man-hating movement, as it labels them “sexist” when they behave like gentleman. 

We need look no further for an example of the worst excesses of feminism than the play, “The Vulgar Monologues”, by Eve Ensler. It is pornographic and obscene, nothing is taboo, and men are vilified throughout. We have campaigned against this play and attempted to have it banned, by warning the public about the nature of it, by letters to theatres and by public protest. A college student in USA opposed this play when it came to her college, and she received death threats! Her name is Ruth Malhotra. 

We will end this post with a quote from a feminist: “Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice.” 

Our Right to Moderate Comments

We welcome readers and their comments. However, we reserve the right to forbid comments containing blasphemy, obscene language and threats. We will approve comments disagreeing with us. We are not dictators!

This entry was posted on June 29, 2012. 1 Comment

Heads Covered but Legs Exposed!

Many Evangelical Christian Churches observe the practice of head covering for women (the wearing of hats), as they believe that it is taught in the Bible and must be encouraged, irrespective of the culture and age in which we live. We agree with this teaching and practice. However, we have observed that the head covering has become more important in some churches than the covering of the body!

So, in many Churches, we see the outrageous spectacle of woman with heads covered but legs (and other parts of the body) either uncovered or insufficiently covered. Where is the rebuke of the disgraceful immodesty of many professing Christian women? Is such rebuke heard thundering from the pulpits in our Province? It seems to us that some Pastors/Ministers are chief in this trespass in that they are silent, perhaps because in some of their own homes, the plague of immodesty is to be found.

Just recently, we witnessed disgraceful immodesty in a Free Presbyterian church. The worst offender (and there were others) gave a predictable, rebellious response when confronted about her provocative dress by one of the writers of this blog, which went something like this, “That is a matter of opinion”. So there we have it, outrageous bodily exposure is now “a matter of opinion”!  She had her head covered, by the way.

The Lord Jesus Christ would say to Pastors  and Ministers who allow such impurity and unholiness in their Churches to “Take these things hence”.

We will finish with a warning to all those rebellious “Christian” women out there, by sharing the observations of a Detective with over 17 years experience (in USA) who stated that in many murders and attacks on women, provocative dress was a factor. So, immodest Christian women are not only stumbling-blocks to the male members of congregations, but outside the Church, in wider society, they are actually more at risk of attack, so immodesty is positively dangerous!

We finish with this advice, a good standard for the dress of the Christian woman, is summed up in these words: clothing should be long, loose, and lots of it.

This entry was posted on June 29, 2012. 2 Comments

That “Handshake” – Opposition not really relevant” says Eamonn Mallie!

What does the word “relevant” mean? Well, according to one dictionary definition, it means, “important and directly connected with what is being discussed or considered.”

Journalist Eamonn Mallie, when interviewed on BBC Radio 5 Live this week, in response to a question about those who were opposed to Martin McGuinness shaking the Queen’s hand, dismissed such opposition as, “not really relevant”!  So only those in favour of it are “relevant”. When the powers that be state that “everyone is entitled to their views” (on any given subject), don’t believe a word of it, because it isn’t true. The only acceptable view is the politically-correct, non-judgemental, tolerant, and equality/diversity one. Anything else is “not relevant”. Of course, Mr. Mallie is a well-known advocate of the “appeasement process” and, because he has an air of authority and gravitas about him, many are lulled into a false sense of security by him and his ilk.

Those who will not brook any criticism of the overthrow of justice in Northern Ireland have a favourite tactic to discredit those who object to “that handshake” and other examples of Government capitulation to terrorists and terrorism, i.e, lump all objectors together, tar them all with the same brush,  create the impression that they are all against peace. So Christians are linked to so-called Republican “dissidents”, who supposedly opposed Martin McGuinness’s decision to meet the Queen. The “dissidents” are very useful to Sinn Fein because they make them appear courageous, a Party taking “risks for peace.”

Yet another example of the exaltation of the lie at work.

Anonymous Accusers

The recent case against a Londonderry teacher which concluded with a “Not Guilty” verdict clearly shows that when the accused is male and the alleged crime is of a sexual nature, the scales of justice are heavily weighted in favour of the accuser. In this recent case, as in all other similar cases,the accused is named while the accuser is granted anonymity.

In such cases, it is rare for a jury to find a male not guilty, because Feminism has brainwashed society into believing that women are innocent and good (almost always), and that men are evil, therefore guilty (almost always). So here is the question to ask of the accuser of the teacher, “Are you a liar and a false accuser?” Anyone guilty of such should be on trial in a court of law and their identity should be revealed.

In the BBC report of the case of the teacher, it appeared that the reporter hesitated after saying the word “found” and before saying the words “not guilty”, and the impression given was that she would have been happier to report a “guilty”  verdict.

Now, lest anyone think that we believe that men are always innocent, perish the thought. We acknowledge that some men have committed terrible crimes, but that is also true of some women, and many women have become aggressive and violent because of militant Feminism. We are concerned about the many innocent men who have had their lives almost destroyed by man-hating, woman-hating, marriage-hating feminism.

Is there not a strange irony in this concluding thought,  i.e  that radical lesbian,  man-hating, marriage-hating feminists are agitating for, believe it or not, “gay MARRIAGE”, of all things.

This entry was posted on June 28, 2012. 4 Comments

The Story of Tinkebell – the Animal Killer (This is no Fairy Tale)!

In a Politically correct society, the word “art” takes on a new meaning, and acts as a cover for the most vulgar, vile and depraved paintings, plays, music and sculpture etc. When the left-wing, liberal elite are confronted about their degrading “art”, their response denial, i.e, what we think is revolting is not, it is “challenging”! This is a ploy, a tool in their arsenal, and one which they use continually in their campaign to desensitise society to obscenity. Now animal killing in the name of “art” can be added to the above (and the list is not exhaustive).

An evil woman named Katinka Simonse, also known as Tinkebell (and this is not a misspelling), kills animals in the name of “art”. She is a 31 year old living in Amsterdam, and why this savage is not behind bars beggars belief. Many people are petitioning against the Dutch Government and their shortcomings on animal abuse.

However, animal cruelty is not limited to Europe. Some Asian countries are notoriously cruel towards animals. Communist China is infamous in this regard, because China’s ruling elite is brutally repressive, and cares little for animals. They don’t care much for human beings, either, and mankind is the crown of God’s creation. China’s fur farms are places of unspeakable cruelty, and its zoos are no better. They think it is entertainment to drop a terrified, harmless goat into a circle of lions, and the wretched “audience” enjoy gazing at the slow, agonizing death of the poor creature.

In April this year, the Stormont regime gave a right “royal” welcome to Madame Liu Yandong, the highest ranking female politician in the People’s Republic of China.

We read in Proverbs ch. 12 v. 10, “A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.”

This entry was posted on June 27, 2012. 1 Comment

Blood Terrorism – Gays Donating Blood

Last year, the ban on “gay” blood donation was lifted in England, Scotland and Wales. The gay lobby will continue to agitate, threaten and menace the Blood Transfusion Authorities in Northern Ireland until they also capitulate to their insane demand with their cry of “Donation, not Discrimination” which is the logo of the homosexual lobby in the USA, where the ban is still in force. This letter is written to bring certain facts into the public domain, and as a warning to those in authority in N. Ireland who have the power to lift this ban and leave us all (potentially) at the mercy of these aggressive challengers (gays). The following information was kindly provided by Dr. John Diggs Jr. MD, USA and to him we are greatly indebted.

In 1985, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) instituted a rule that homosexual men may not be blood donors. The FDA had determined this was necessary after a rash of innocent people received HIV infections via blood transfusions. Fast forward to 2011, and the push is on for this ban to be lifted and for the gay lobby to jeopardise our (USA) blood supply. The American Red Cross is one organisation that is pushing for the ban to be lifted and it appears that it has become hugely pro-gay in recent years. A quote from “National Journal” a US news magazine is truly frightening, “Men who have sex with other men, including gay and bisexual men, have an HIV infection rate 60 times higher than that of the general population”, FDA says. They have an infection rate 800 times higher than first time blood donors and 8,000 times higher than the rate of repeat blood donors. Tests cannot pick up a new HIV infection in the blood with 100% accuracy, because blood is often pooled, many people may be at risk from a single infected donor.

Here are other quotes, this time from Americans for Truth about Homosexuality, the article entitled, “Keep the gay blood ban”, “Men who have sex with men also have an increased risk of having other infections that can be transmitted to others by blood transfusion. For example, infection with Hepatitis B virus is about 5-6 times more common and Hepatitis C virus infections are about 2 times more common in men who have sex with men than in the general population”.

In light of the above facts, only defiant, liberal, pro-gay, totalitarian, godless individuals would sacrifice public health in their insane drive to normalise that which the Bible calls sin, the delusional thinking of a reprobate mind.